| Zugriffsnummer | 43787 |
| Dokumenttyp | Konferenzartikel in Zeitschrift |
| Peer Review | mit Peer Review |
| Sprache | Englisch |
| Titel | The use of active personal dosemeters in international workplaces in hospitals: Comparison between active and passive dosemeters worn simultaneously by medical staff |
| Autor(in); Institution |
Vanhavere, Filip; SCK-CEN, Belgian Nuclear Centre, Mol, BELGIUM
Carinou, E.; Greek Atomic Energy Commission, EEAE, Attiki, GREECE
Clairand, I.; IRSN, Institute for Radiolocigal Protection and Nuclear Safery, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, FRANCE
Ciraj-Bjelac, O.; University of Belgrade, VINS, Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, SERBIA
De Monte, F.; Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, ITALY
Domienik-Andrzejewska, J.; NIOM, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, POLAND
Ferrari, P.; ENEA. IRP - Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna, ITALY
Ginjaume, M.; UPC, Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, SPAIN
Hrsak, Hrvoje; University Hospital Centre Zagreb, CROATIA
Hupe, Oliver; 6.3, Strahlenschutzdosimetrie, PTB-Braunschweig
Knezevic, Z.; Ruder Boskovic Institute, RIB, Zagreb, CROATIA
O'Connor, U.; St. James Hospital, Dublin, IRELAND
Sans Merce, M.; CHUV, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, SWITZERLAND
Sarmento, S.; Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, PORTUGAL
Savary, A.; IRSN, Institute for Radiolocigal Protection and Nuclear Safery, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, FRANCE
Siskoonen, T.; STUK, Helsinki, FINLAND
|
| Quelle/Jahr | Radiation Protection Dosimetry: 188 (2020), 1, 22 - 29 |
| ISSN | 0144-8420 (PRINT) ; 1742-3406 (ONLINE) |
| DOI | |
| Verlag | Oxford: Oxford University Press |
| Konferenzangaben | 19th International Conference on Solid State Dosimetry (SSD), Hiroshima, 10-15, September, 2019, Japan |
| Zusammenfassung | Medical staff in international procedures are among the professional with the highest occupational doses. Active personal dosemeters ('APDs) can help in optimizing the exposure during interventional procedures. However, there can be problems when using APDS during interventional procedures, due to the specific energy and angular distribution of the radiation field and because of the pulsed nature of the radiation. Many parameters like the type of interventional procedure, personal habits and working techniques, protection tools used and X-ray field characteristics influence the occupational exposure and the scattered radiation around the patient. In this paper, we compare the results from three types of APDs with a passive personal dosimetry system while being used in real clinical environment by the interventional staff. The results show that her is a large spread in the ratios of the passive and active devices. |
Zitierung
Vanhavere, F., Carinou, E., Clairand, I., Ciraj-Bjelac, O., De Monte, F., Domienik-Andrzejewska, J., Ferrari, P., Ginjaume, M., Hrsak, H., Hupe, O., Knezevic, Z., O'Connor, U., Sans Merce, M., Sarmento, S., Savary, A., & Siskoonen, T. (2020). The use of active personal dosemeters in international workplaces in hospitals: Comparison between active and passive dosemeters worn simultaneously by medical staff. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 188(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncz253