Zugriffsnummer 39802
Dokumenttyp Zeitschriftenartikel
Sprache Englisch
Titel Electrolytic conductivity at 0.5 S m−1 and 5 mSm−1
Autor(in); Institution
Seitz, Steffen; 3.4, Physikalische Chemie, PTB-Braunschweig
Sander, Beatrice; 3.4, Physikalische Chemie, PTB-Braunschweig
Snedden, A.; Dansk Fundamental Metrologi (DFM), Lyngby, DENMARK
DeLeeBeeck, L.; Dansk Fundamental Metrologi (DFM), Lyngby, DENMARK
Canaza, G.T.; Instituto Nacional de Calidad (INACAL), Lima, PERU
Asakai, T.; National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), Tsukuba, JAPAN
Maksimov, I.; National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), Tsukuba, JAPAN
Song, X.; National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, CHINA
Wang, H.; National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, CHINA
Kozlowski, W.; Central Office of Measures, Warsaw, POLAND
Dumanska, J.; Central Office of Measures, Warsaw, POLAND
Jakusovszky, B.; Government Office of the Capital City, Budapest, HUNGARY
Szilágyi, Z.N.; Government Office of the Capital City, Budapest, HUNGARY
Gavrilkin, V.; State Enterprise All-Ukrainian State, Research and production Center of Standardization Metrology, Certification and Consumers' Rights Protection, Kyiv, UKRAINE
Stennik, O.; State Enterprise All-Ukrainian State, Research and production Center of Standardization Metrology, Certification and Consumers' Rights Protection, Kyiv, UKRAINE
Ovchinnikov, Y.; Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology, Mendeleevo, RUSSIA
Gonzaga, F.B.; Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia (INMETRO), Divisão de Metrologia Química Laboratório de Eletroquímica, Duque de Caxias, BRAZIL
da Cruz Cunha, K.; Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia (INMETRO), Divisão de Metrologia Química Laboratório de Eletroquímica, Duque de Caxias, BRAZIL
Ferraz, S.F.; Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay, Departamento de Metrología Química, Montevideo, URUGUAY
Hanková, Z.; Slovak Institute of Metrology, Bratislava, SLOVAKIA
Máriássy, M.; Slovak Institute of Metrology, Bratislava, SLOVAKIA
Vicarova, M.; Czech Metrology Institute, Primary Metrology Physical Chemistry Department, Brno, CZECH REPUBLIC
Vospelova, A.; Czech Metrology Institute, Primary Metrology Physical Chemistry Department, Brno, CZECH REPUBLIC
Ortiz-Aparicio, J.L.; Centro Nacional de Metrología (CENAM), Municipio El Marqués, MEXICO
Lara-Manzano, J.V.; Centro Nacional de Metrología (CENAM), Municipio El Marqués, MEXICO
Uribe-Godínez, J.; Centro Nacional de Metrología (CENAM), Municipio El Marqués, MEXICO
Stoica, D.; Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d'Essais,rtholomé, Paris, FRANCE
Fisicaro, P.; Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d'Essais,rtholomé, Paris, FRANCE
Suvorov, V.I.; D.I.Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology, St.Petersburg, RUSSIA
Konopelko, L.A.; D.I.Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology, St.Petersburg, RUSSIA
Smirnov, A.M.; D.I.Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology, St.Petersburg, RUSSIA
Amaya, R.C.; National Metrology Institute of Colombia, Bogota, COLOMBIA
Quezada, H.T.; National Metrology Institute of Colombia, Bogota, COLOMBIA
Quelle/Jahr Metrologia: 54 (2017), Tech. Suppl., 08032
ISSN 0026-1394 (PRINT) ; 1681-7575 (ONLINE)
DOI
Verlag Bristol [u.a.]: Inst. of Physics Publ
Zusammenfassung Key Comparison CCQM-K36.2016 was a follow-up comparison for K36 and provided updated support for the corresponding calibration and measurement capability (CMC) entries in the BIPM CMC database. It aimed to demonstrate the capabilities of the participating NMIs to measure electrolytic conductivity of aqueous electrolyte solutions in the conductivity range 0.15 S m−1 to 1.5 S m−1 and in the conductivity range 1.5 mS m−1 to 15 mS m−1. To this end electrolytic conductivity of a potassium chloride solution (nominal conductivity 0.5 S m−1) and of a HCl solution (nominal conductivity 5 mS m−1) had to be measured. 17 NMIs participated in the comparison. The key comparison reference value (KCRV) of the KCl solution was (0.50999 +/-0.00032) S m−1 and the KCRV of the HCl solution was (4.9877 +/-0.012) mS m−1. Both values were estimated from the medians of the results considered eligible for KCRV calculation. They were given with their expanded uncertainties (95% coverage). The majority of the 0.5 S m-1 results were consistent with the KCRV. Two institutes showed a small inconsistency, one outlier was observed. The conductivity of the HCl solution showed a small, but steady linear drift of 0.00006843 mS m−1 per day during the measurement period and was corrected for KCRV calculation. Some institutes reported unstable measurement conditions for this solution. The results of seven participants have been inconsistent with the KCRV.

Zitierung

Seitz, S., Sander, B., Snedden, A., DeLeeBeeck, L., Canaza, G., Asakai, T., Maksimov, I., Song, X., Wang, H., Kozlowski, W., Dumanska, J., Jakusovszky, B., Szilágyi, Z., Gavrilkin, V., Stennik, O., Ovchinnikov, Y., Gonzaga, F., da Cruz Cunha, K., Ferraz, S., Hanková, Z., Máriássy, M., Vicarova, M., Vospelova, A., Ortiz-Aparicio, J., Lara-Manzano, J., Uribe-Godínez, J., Stoica, D., Fisicaro, P., Suvorov, V., Konopelko, L., Smirnov, A., Amaya, R., & Quezada, H. (2017). Electrolytic conductivity at 0.5 S m−1 and 5 mSm−1. Metrologia, 54(Tech. Suppl.), 08032. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/54/1a/08032

Exportieren

PTB-Publica Menü

Sprache wechseln: uk flag