Zugriffsnummer 35978
Dokumenttyp Zeitschriftenartikel
Peer Review unbekannt
Sprache Englisch
Titel Intercomparison of eye lens dosemeters
Autor(in); Institution
Behrens, Rolf; 6.3, Strahlenschutzdosimetrie, PTB-Braunschweig
Hupe, Oliver; 6.3, Strahlenschutzdosimetrie, PTB-Braunschweig
Busch, F.; MPA Nordrhein-Westfalen, Dortmund, GERMANY
Denk, J.; Helmholtz-Zentrum München, München, GERMANY
Engelhardt, J.; Landesanstalt für Personendosimetrie u. Strahlenschutzausbildung, Berlin, GERMANY
Günther, K.; Strahlenmessstelle Berlin, Personendosismessstelle, Berlin, GERMANY
Hödlmoser, H.; Helmholtz-Zentrum München, München, GERMANY
Jordan, M.; MPA Nordrhein-Westfalen, Dortmund, GERMANY
Strohmaier, J.; Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, GERMANY
Quelle/Jahr Radiation Protection Dosimetry: 174 (2017), 1, 6 - 12
ISSN 1742-3406 (ONLINE) ; 0144-8420 (PRINT)
DOI
Verlag Oxford: Oxford University Press
Zusammenfassung An intercomparison of eye lens dosemeters has been conducted in terms of the quantity Hp(3). for the first time, besides photon radiation also beta radiation qualities were included. Three dosemeter types designed for the quantity Hp(3) and ten for Hp(0.07)  took part in the intercomparison. As shown in a previous intercomparison for photon radiation only, the dosemeters designed for  Hp(0.07) and calibrated in terms of Hp(3) performed well in photon radiation fields. But for beta radiation, it turned out that Hp(0.07) dosemeters over-responded up to a factor of 5 000 (with respect to the true Hp(3). dose) in the medium beta energy range (85Kr with a beta endpoint energy of 0.69 MeV), while some Hp(3). dosemeters performed quite well. For medium (57 keV) and high (662 keV) energy photon radiation, all dosemeter types showed response values well within the trumpet curve according to the current draft of ISO 14146.

Zitierung

Behrens, R., Hupe, O., Busch, F., Denk, J., Engelhardt, J., Günther, K., Hödlmoser, H., Jordan, M., & Strohmaier, J. (2017). Intercomparison of eye lens dosemeters. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 174(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw051

Exportieren

PTB-Publica Menü

Sprache wechseln: uk flag