Zugriffsnummer 28009
Dokumenttyp Zeitschriftenartikel
Peer Review unbekannt
Sprache Englisch
Titel Final report CCQM-K87: Mono-elemental calibration solutions.
Autor(in); Institution
Rienitz, Olaf; 3.1, Metrologie in der Chemie, PTB-Braunschweig
Schiel, Detlef; 3.1, Metrologie in der Chemie, PTB-Braunschweig
Görlitz, Volker; 3.1, Metrologie in der Chemie, PTB-Braunschweig
Jährling, Reinhard; 3.1, Metrologie in der Chemie, PTB-Braunschweig
Vogl, Jochen; Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung (BAM), Berlin, GERMANY
Lara-Manzano, Judith Velina; Centro Nacional de Metrologia (CENAM), El Marqués, MEXICO
Zon, Agnieszka; GUM, Warschau, POLAND
Fung, Wai-hong; Hong Kong Gems Laboratory (HKGL), CHINA
Buzoianu, Mirella; National Institute of Metrology (INM), Bucharest, ROMANIA
Caciano de Sena, Rodrigo; Instituto Nacional de Metrologia (INM), BRAZIL
Augusto dos Reis, Lindomar; Instituto Nacional de Metrologia (INM), BRAZIL
Valiente, Liliana; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Industrial (INTI), San Martín, ARGENTINA
Yim, Yong-Hyeon; Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, (KRISS), Daejeon, KOREA
Hill, Sarah; LGC Standards (LGC), Teddington, UK
Chamion, Rachel; Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais (LNE), FRANCE
Fisicaro, Paola; Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais (LNE), FRANCE
Bing, Wu; NIM, CHINA
Turk, Gregory C.; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA
Winchester, Michael; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA
Saxby, David; National Measurement Institute of Australia (NMIA), AUSTRALIA
Merrick, Jeffrey; National Measurement Institute of Australia (NMIA), AUSTRALIA
Hioki, Akiharu; National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), JAPAN
Miura, Tsutomu; National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), JAPAN
Suzuki, Toshihiro; National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), JAPAN
Linsky, Maré; National Metrology Institute of South Africa (NMISA), SOUTH AFRICA
Barzev, Alex; National Metrology Institute of South Africa (NMISA), SOUTH AFRICA
Máriássy, Michal; Slovak Institute of Metrology (SMU), SLOVAKIA
Cankur, Oktay; Ulusal Metroloji Enstitüsü (TUBITAK UME), TURKEY
Ari, Betül; Ulusal Metroloji Enstitüsü (TUBITAK UME), TURKEY
Tunc, Murat; Ulusal Metroloji Enstitüsü (TUBITAK UME), TURKEY
Konopelko, L. A.; D.I. Mendeleev All-Russian Institute for Metrology (VNIIM), St. Petersburg, RUSSIA
Kustikov, Y.A.; D.I. Mendeleev All-Russian Institute for Metrology (VNIIM), St. Petersburg, RUSSIA
Bezruchko, Marina; D.I. Mendeleev All-Russian Institute for Metrology (VNIIM), St. Petersburg, RUSSIA
Quelle/Jahr Metrologia: 49 (2012), 1A, Tech. Suppl., 104 S.
Artikelnummer 08010
Availability [online only]
ISSN 1681-7575
DOI
Verlag Bristol [u.a.]: IOP [u.a.]
Zusammenfassung The aim of this comparison was to demonstrate the capability of national metrology institutes to measure elemental mass fractions at a level of w(E) ≈ 1 g/kg as found in almost all mono-elemental calibration solutions. These calibration solutions represent an important link in traceability systems in inorganic analysis. Virtually all traceable routine measurements are linked to the SI through these calibration solutions. Every participant was provided with three solutions of each of the three selected elements chromium, cobalt and lead. This comparison was a joint activity of the Inorganic Analysis Working Group (IAWG) and the Electrochemical Analysis Working Group (EAWG) of the CCQM and was piloted by the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB, Braunschweig, Germany) with the help of the Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM, Berlin, Germany), the Centro Nacional de Metrología (CENAM, Querétaro, Mexico) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, Gaithersburg, USA). A small majority of participants applied inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES) in combination with a variety of calibration strategies (one-point-calibration, bracketing, calibration curve, each with and without an internal standard). But also IDMS techniques were carried out on quadrupole, high resolution and multicollector ICP-MS machines as well as a TIMS machine. Several participants applied titrimetry. FAAS as well as ICP-MS combined with non-IDMS calibration strategies were used by at least one participant. The key comparison reference values (KCRV) were agreed upon during the IAWG/EAWG meeting in November 2011 held in Sydney as the added element content calculated from the gravimetric sample preparation. Accordingly the degrees of equivalence were calculated. Despite the large variety of methods applied no superior method could be identified. The relative deviation of the median of the participants' results from the gravimetric reference value was equal or smaller than 0.1% (with an average of 0.05%) in the case of all three elements. Orig.-Titel des Reports: Final report on CCQM-K87: Mono-elemental calibration solutions

Zitierung

Rienitz, O., Schiel, D., Görlitz, V., Jährling, R., Vogl, J., Lara-Manzano, J. V., Zon, A., Fung, W.-H., Buzoianu, M., Caciano de Sena, R., Augusto dos Reis, L., Valiente, L., Yim, Y.-H., Hill, S., Chamion, R., Fisicaro, P., Bing, W., Turk, G. C., Winchester, M., Saxby, D., Merrick, J., Hioki, A., Miura, T., Suzuki, T., Linsky, M., Barzev, A., Máriássy, M., Cankur, O., Ari, B., Tunc, M., Konopelko, L. A., Kustikov, Y., & Bezruchko, M. (2012). Final report CCQM-K87: Mono-elemental calibration solutions. Metrologia, 49(1A, Tech. Suppl.), 104 S. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/49/1a/08010

Exportieren

PTB-Publica Menü

Sprache wechseln: uk flag